Excerpts from various news articles this past week:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecdb0/ecdb0e220ab6a8278701863499fc935ec2bfd4d4" alt=""
The SAPD dispatcher originally coded the call as a case of family violence with a gun. But the incident ultimately was classified as a disturbance..."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bcef/0bcef1db7ae3ced12c1ee4a05fa0d0b9b257355f" alt=""
...Yolanda Uresti did not return phone calls seeking clarification about the allegations she made early Saturday, none of which were addressed directly in her statement...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf87e/cf87e30a4311cdcb971b1e500cb07f32ab500421" alt=""
A police department that would do it for the senator, would surely do this kind of re-write of reality for it's own as well.
Surely.
MOST
of the articles this past week don't even mention the gun at all. What does that tell us? How scary is that? MOST of the news articles say only that Yolanda vengefully called the police because her husband was having an affair. (Like she's a nut.) No mention of a gun. No mention of the changed dispatch report. For that reason I included the word "gun" in the search string of the link above - to only include reports that are discussing the fuller available story.
Yolanda regrets calling the San Antonio Police Department.
It's evident why. She called for help and she got
what?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please post updates or email them to behindthebluewall@gmail.com. No cop-hating or victim-hating comments allowed. Word verification had to be added due to spam attacks on this blog.